MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W922297173

Positive Counsellor Characteristics with Sexual Minority Intimate Partner Violence Victims/Caractéristiques Positives De Conseillers Travaillant Avec Victimes De Violence Aux Mains De Partenaires Intimes D'une Minorité Sexuelle

2014· article· fr· W922297173 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ryan Hancock

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violencePopulationPsychologySexual abuseFocus groupPoison controlSuicide preventionSocial psychologyMedicineSociologyMedical emergencyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scholars and practitioners in the counselling profession continue to produce significant advances in work with ethnic minorities. However, counsellor competency with sexual minorities remains underdeveloped, specifically in the area of work with sexual minority intimate partner violence victims (SMIPWs). By contrast, research regarding competency in counselling heterosexual intimate partner violence victims is prolific (Hellmuth, Follansbee, Moore, & Stuart, 2008; Murray & Mobley, 2009; Speziale & Ring, 2006). The SMIPW population is at a heightened risk because they are both a generally oppressed group and victims of abuse (Cruz & Firestone, 1998). Further research into establishing specific factors important for enhancing counsellor competency with SMIPWs is important in order to provide the best practices for this at-risk population. Best practices can help to ensure that only the most effective treatments are provided and will discourage the use of non-empirically based treatments.I argue that research exploring competency in counselling SMIPWs is essential to improving client outcomes. Research in intimate partner violence (IPV) conducted thus far has primarily focused on heterosexual female victims (Balsam & Szymanski, 2005; Hellmuth et al., 2008). The literature that does exist on competency in counselling SMIPWs is almost entirely quantitative in nature (Hellmuth et al., 2008; Murray & Mobley, 2009). Solely using quantitative research designs that focus on statistical significance and numerical data do not directly evoke the life expression of the research participants. For example, although numerical data can reveal the frequency with which a certain counselling technique was utilized, the frequency cannot directly communicate the rich qualitative psychological experience certain counselling techniques had on helping participants improve their quality of life. For that reason, a qualitative design from a queer theory perspective utilizing grounded theory methods was used for this study. Queer theory is a theoretical approach to examining culture that embraces an expanded understanding of gender and sexuality that rejects mainstream definitions (Valocchi, 2005). Simply stated, queer theory rejects what most people believe it means to be male, female, gay, or straight (Valocchi, 2005). Queer theory starts from the assumption that any given sexuality is natural and therefore is not in need of correction. This assumption is a concept that is largely ignored by other qualitative research (Warner, 2004). I used a grounded theory approach to conduct an in-depth exploration of the factors associated with counsellor competency with the SMIPW population and postulated those factors associated with counsellor competency.INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCEIPV is prevalent in the United States and affects men and women of any sexual orientation (Balsam & Szymanski, 2005; Hellmuth et al., 2008). IPV has significant negative impacts on the abused individual, including immediate and long-term physical health, mental health, family relationships, social support, occupational difficulties, and financial well-being (Heintz & Melendez, 2006; Murray & Mobley, 2009; National Institute of Justice, 2007). Those individuals experiencing intimate partner violence often live in a situation where their abusive partner has the ability to control multiple aspects of their lives, which causes many victims to find difficulty in asserting their needs and wants for social support and finances (Heintz & Melendez, 2006; Murray & Mobley, 2009).Sexual Minorities and Intimate Partner ViolenceThere is a paucity of research in the scientific literature regarding the prevalence and factors associated with IPV and the sexual minority population (or SMIPWs). The research bias in favour of studying heterosexual couples affects the understanding of these victims. The majority of intimate partner violence studies focus on male violence against women in heterosexual relationships (Balsam & Szymanski, 2005; Murray & Mobley, 2009). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207