MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W922321399 · doi:10.4000/lrf.174

Georges Lefebvre et les premières Annales

2022· article· fr· W922321399 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Dumoulin

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Révolution française · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Georges Lefebvre et les premires Annales, le rapprochement tient tout la fois de l'vidence et de l'oubli 1 . Mais, avant de parler d'vidence, il convient de savoir de ce dont on parle : de liens institutionnels, d'appartenance un rseau, de communaut de travail, de concidences des positions, ou d'changes intellectuels En clair, pour citer Franois Dosse, s'agit-il de recomposer une histoire d'intellectuels ou une histoire intellectuelle 2 ? Je me donne ici pour contrat d'explorer les liens intellectuels de la production de Lucien Febvre et de Marc Bloch avec l'oeuvre de Georges Lefebvre, jusqu'en 1940. Mais, avant d'en venir ce que les hommes des Annales lisaient dans les travaux de Georges Lefebvre, il convient de mesurer l'intensit du lien et la ralit de la distance entre eux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Révolution françaiseSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207