Proapoptotic and antiapoptotic effects of hyperglycemia: role of insulin signalingThis article is one of a selection of papers published in the special issue Bridging the Gap: Where Progress in Cardiovascular and Neurophysiologic Research Meet.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucose toxicity is an important initiator of cardiovascular disease, contributing to the development of insulin resistance, impaired contractile function, abnormal energy metabolism, cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell death, coronary heart disease, and heart failure. High blood glucose can, however, paradoxically protect the heart against a variety of insults, including ischemia, hypoxia, and calcium overload. To provide information on the underlying basis of these divergent actions of high glucose, the present study examined the hypothesis that the adverse effects of high glucose are linked to impaired insulin signaling, leading to a reduction in the levels of cytoprotective factors, and that the beneficial effects of high glucose occur in the absence of insulin and result in an improvement in Akt signaling. This hypothesis was evaluated by using an in vitro cardiomyocyte model that is amenable to manipulations in glucose and insulin. Prolonged exposure of the isolated neonatal cardiomyocyte to medium containing insulin and high glucose led to increased susceptibility to angiotensin II-mediated apoptosis, an effect associated with reduced levels of phospho-Akt and an increased Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. By contrast, exposure to high glucose levels in the absence of insulin rendered the cardiomyocyte resistant to angiotensin II-mediated apoptosis. Because the beneficial effects of high glucose were associated with elevations in phospho-Akt and Bcl-2 content, the cardioprotective activity of high glucose resembles the actions of insulin. Hence, the activation state of Akt is largely determined by the activity of insulin and other growth factors. Because high glucose diminishes insulin signaling, it reduces phospho-Akt levels and renders the cell susceptible to damaging insults. In the absence of insulin, however, the natural activity of high glucose is unmasked. As a result, Akt signaling is increased and the cell is rendered resistant to cell death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".