MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W94405835

Western Icelandic Women Writers: Their Contribution to the Literary Canon

2016· article· en· W94405835 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kirsten Wolf, Einar H. Kvaran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilippine History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcelandicHistoryLiteratureDozenClassicsArtPhilosophyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guomundur Finnbogason's anthology Vestem um hafy published as a gesture of friendship to American-Icelandic visitors at the millennial celebration of the Aljpingi in 1930. Although the book has done much to attract attention to Western Icelandic literature, the editors' selection is somewhat unfortunate, because it gives the mistaken impression that among firstand second-generation Icelandic immigrants in Canada and the United States writing was almost exclusively a male venture. Of the thirty-six writers included in Vestan um hafy only three are women: Jakobina Johnson (1883-1977), Guorun H. Finnsdottir (1884-1946), and Laura Goodman Salverson (1890-1970). Stefan Einarsson (1948: 233-255) in his survey of Western Icelandic prose writers adds to these three Rannveig K. G. Sigbjornsson (1880-1963) and Arnrun fra Felli (pen-name of Guorun Tomasdottir; 1886-1963) and makes brief mention of Torfhildur Eorsteinsdottir Holm (1845-1918) and Holmfriour G. C. Sharpe (1858-1898), while Richard Beck (1950: 199-242) in a similar survey of Western Icelandic poets, includes discussion of only Jakobina Johnson and Laura Goodman Salverson and briefly mentions Undina (pen-name of Helga Steinvor Baldvinsdottir; 1858-1941) and Helen Swinburne Lloyd (1892-1979). That these historical overviews are somewhat misleading as far as the literary activities of women writers are concerned is evident not only

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhilippine History and CultureFrench-language works237,207