MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W951155664 · doi:10.22329/p.v7i2.3828

« Insurmontablement étranger au monde » : le Kleist de Gundolf. Note de lecture sur Friedrich GUNDOLF, <i>Heinrich von Kleist</i>

2012· article· fr· W951155664 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nathalie Lachance

Bibliographic record

VenuePhaenEx · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and Historical Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il faut se rjouir de voir arriver sur les tablettes des librairies francophones un ouvrage consacr l'crivain prussien Heinrich von Kleist (1777Kleist ( -1811)), encore trop peu connu hors des frontires allemandes. La rcente proposition des ditions du Flin saura veiller la curiosit du lecteur l'endroit de Kleist. Elle reprend notamment un texte de Friedrich Gundolf (du cercle du clbre pote Stefan George) au sujet de Kleist, publi en allemand en 1922 et traduit en franais en 1936 par Alexandre Vialatte. Dans sa prface l'ouvrage, le germaniste et essayiste Eryck de Rubercy tente de complter le portrait plutt fragmentaire que l'on se fait de Kleist la lecture du texte de Gundolf. Suit le court essai de Kleist L'laboration de la pense par le discours. Rubercy propose ensuite une chronologie de la vie et des oeuvres de Kleist et une trs courte bibliographie qui se concentre surtout sur les traductions franaises des oeuvres de Kleist. L'ouvrage semble destin ceux et celles qui ne connaissent pas cet crivain que les Allemands lvent maintenant au rang de Goethe et de Schiller. La lecture des textes de Gundolf et de Rubercy, inspirs et impeccablement crits, laissera cependant le lecteur sur sa faim, car si l'on y

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhaenExSame topicPhilosophy and Historical ThoughtFrench-language works237,207