Analyses of connections between Atlantic Bluefin tuna fisheries at both sites of the Atlantic comprising Balfegó catch rates in Balearic spawning ground.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study analyzes connections among Atlantic bluefin tuna fisheries at both sites of the Atlantic.Catch rates of nine fisheries including Balfeg CPUE are analyzed in this study.In 2012 Balfeg CPUE near triplicates 2011 rates and showed the strength of 2003 cohort.The correlation analysis showed positive 1 correlations between The Gulf of St. Lawrence fishery, Japanese LL in area 2, Spanish traps and Balfeg purse seiners, indicators of the eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna breeders.The U.S. northeast Atlantic fishery correlates negatively with Gulf of St Lawrence, south of Nova Scotia and Japanese LL in region 17&18 but positively with eastern juveniles of Spanish baitboat indices of ages 1, 2, and 3.Japanese longliners indices of western and eastern correlate positively; no correlation was found within each group.Japanese longliners Area 3 correlates positively with Spanish baitboat age 1, age 2 with areas 5&med and 17&18.The south Nova Scotia fishery correlates negative with ages 3 and 4. Morocco traps, the only fishery that did not correlate with any other.This study showed valuable information and reveals the need to revise the current western and eastern fisheries categorization criteria and provides additional tool to investigate the Atlantic bluefin tuna distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it