MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Red blood cells induce lung inflammation in hypoxia

2007· article· en· W9580603 on OpenAlexaff
Rainer Kiefman, Joseph A Rifkind, Mary E. Fabry, Jahar Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)PerfusionChemistryInflammationRed blood cellMicrocirculationLungSuperoxideEndocrinologyPharmacologyMolecular biologyImmunologyInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistryOxygenMedicineEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Red blood cells (RBCs) determine systemic vascular tone by releasing vasoactive factors. To determine RBC‐induced lung responses, we inflated isolated, blood‐perfused lungs of rat or mouse with normoxic or hypoxic gas. Corresponding blood pO2 were 150 and 33 mmHg. Using our reported methods (J. Clin. Invest. 2003. 111: –699), we quantified fluorescence in single endothelial cells (ECs) of lung capillaries by real‐time fluorescence imaging. Using the dichloroluorescin (DCF) and fura 2 methods respectively, we detected EC ROS and EC cytosolic Ca2+ (Ca2+cyt) levels. In the presence of RBC‐containing perfusion, hypoxic inflation increased both ROS and Ca2+cyt above baseline (P<0.05). However, both increases were blocked during RBC‐free perfusion, or by inclusion of the H2O2 hydrolyzing agent, catalase in RBC‐containing perfusion. The wild type hypoxic response caused leukocyte recruitment that was inhibited by separate infusions of RBC‐free plasma, catalase, or of a blocking mAb against the leukocyte adhesion receptor, P‐selectin (P<0.05). Perfusion with RBC from BERK‐trait mice, in which hypoxia enhances RBC superoxide production, enhanced both hypoxia‐induced EC ROS and the induced leukocyte recruitment (P<0.05). We conclude that in hypoxia, RBCs generate H2O2 that induces Ca2+‐dependent EC P‐selectin expression, leading to leukocyte recruitment, hence initiation of inflammation (HL69514).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicErythrocyte Function and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207