Traducción de la prensa extranjera e intertextualidad en el periodo preindependentista de la Gaceta de Caracas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En las dos últimas décadas, la historiografía venezolana ha propuesto una relectura de algunos de los eventos del proceso de independencia como resultado del influjo de representaciones extranjeras y de complejos intereses políticos y económicos que determinaron la participación de hombres públicos y letrados. Sobre estos nombres son escasos los análisis que los consideren, más allá de su función individual, como cuerpo político-social y cultural que mediante la traducción genera redes de comunicación y sociabilización, ejercicio lingüístico, a nuestro parecer, determinante para comprender la visión que se hace desde/sobre la Venezuela de principios del siglo xix. Este trabajo busca identificar la prensa extranjera referida en la Gaceta de octubre de 1810 a julio 1811, las redes de sentido establecidas por la interpretación intra e interlingüística y su influjo en la consolidación de valores e imaginaros sociales en los meses previos a la independencia venezolana
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".