Robustness and Retrofit Strategies for Seismically-Designed Multistory Steel Frame Buildings Prone to Progressive Collapse
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have studied the effect of CCK on proximal gastric motor function in humans. Seven healthy volunteers participated in three experiments performed in random order during continuous intravenous infusion of 1) saline (control), 2) 0.5 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK, and 3) 1.0 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK. Proximal gastric mechanics were measured by an electronic barostat, and abdominal symptoms were scored by visual analog scales. Infusion of 0.5 and 1.0 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK resulted in plasma CCK levels (RIA) in the postprandial range. CCK induced gastric relaxation; at 2 mmHg above intra-abdominal pressure the intragastric volume during 1.0 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK was significantly increased over saline (363 +/- 44 vs. 195 +/- 34 ml; P < 0.01) but not during 0.5 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK (195 +/- 14 ml; not significant). During both isovolumetric and isobaric distensions, 1.0 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK significantly (P < 0.05) increased proximal gastric compliance compared with saline. However, 0.5 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK had no significant effect on gastric compliance. During volume distensions, but not during fixed pressure distensions, 1.0 IDU.kg-1.h-1 CCK significantly (P < 0.05) reduced visceral perception. These results suggest that in humans CCK may have a physiological role in regulating proximal gastric mechanics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it