MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W96221926

ANGLICANORUM COETIBUS: TEXT AND COMMENTARY

2009· article· en· W96221926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia canonica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyPolitical sciencePhilosophySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voici le texte et un commentaire canonique sur la Constitution apostolique du Pape Benoit XVI, Anglicanorum cœtibus (AC), du 4 novembre 2009. Le meme jour, la Congregation pour la Doctrine de la Foi promulgua des normes administratives complementaires pour la mise en application de l'AC. (La version francaise de l'AC et des normes complementaires se trouve a la fin de cet article.) Le but de l'AC est de faciliter l'accueil des anciens Anglicans dans la pleine communion de l'Eglise catholique, en leur permettant d'avoir leurs propres structures ecclesiales, des pretres maries et des rites liturgiques propres. Il cree un nouveau type d'ordinariat, une competence personnelle dirigee par un ordinaire qui est semblable a un ordinariat militaire, mais avec une difference majeure. Contrairement a l'ordinaire militaire qui a tous les pouvoirs et les facultes de l'eveque diocesain, l'ordinaire de l'AC n'a pas de pouvoir legislatif et judiciaire. Il ne dispose que des pouvoirs executifs et d'autres facultes de droit des ordinaires en general, mais non pas celles des Ordinaires de lieu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it