Bibliographic record
Abstract
Voici le texte et un commentaire canonique sur la Constitution apostolique du Pape Benoit XVI, Anglicanorum cœtibus (AC), du 4 novembre 2009. Le meme jour, la Congregation pour la Doctrine de la Foi promulgua des normes administratives complementaires pour la mise en application de l'AC. (La version francaise de l'AC et des normes complementaires se trouve a la fin de cet article.) Le but de l'AC est de faciliter l'accueil des anciens Anglicans dans la pleine communion de l'Eglise catholique, en leur permettant d'avoir leurs propres structures ecclesiales, des pretres maries et des rites liturgiques propres. Il cree un nouveau type d'ordinariat, une competence personnelle dirigee par un ordinaire qui est semblable a un ordinariat militaire, mais avec une difference majeure. Contrairement a l'ordinaire militaire qui a tous les pouvoirs et les facultes de l'eveque diocesain, l'ordinaire de l'AC n'a pas de pouvoir legislatif et judiciaire. Il ne dispose que des pouvoirs executifs et d'autres facultes de droit des ordinaires en general, mais non pas celles des Ordinaires de lieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".