La continuidad de los servicios jurídicos en la Administración ante una huelga de fiscales y abogados del Estado: la experiencia de Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En los ultimos tiempos se ha debatido ampliamente sobre el derecho de huelga de los jueces, sin que haya podido llegarse aun a una posicion pacifica. Practicamente inedito es, sin embargo, el interes de la doctrina por el ejercicio de este derecho fundamental por parte de fiscales y abogados del Estado, que tambien carecen en este ambito de una regulacion legal especifica y comparten con jueces y magistrados muchos de los rasgos que justifican un tratamiento diferenciado. Con una vision de Derecho comparado y a partir de una presentacion general de la situacion de los colectivos equivalentes en Quebec, este trabajo contiene una cronica de la huelga que sacudio la Administracion de Justicia de aquella provincia canadiense durante el ano 2011. Su seguimiento tuvo importantes efectos juridicos, con la adopcion de varias leyes especiales y recursos de inconstitucionalidad, y ecos sobre otros colectivos con relacion de sujecion especial donde la titularidad del derecho de huelga tambien es controvertida y resultan afectados igualmente otros derechos fundamentales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".