MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W964870562

Stomatal conductance and stomatal resistance studies in relation to haulm yield in potato.

2012· article· en· W964870562 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Varsha Apotikar, J. D. Jadhav, PB Pawar, V. M. Londhe, S. V. Shinde

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Biological Sciences · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStomatal conductanceSowingAgronomyIrrigationPhotosynthesisTranspirationCropCanopyYield (engineering)AgricultureEnvironmental scienceCultivarProductivityBiologyHorticultureBotanyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major potato growing countries in the world are China, Russian Federation, India, USA, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, Belarus, Netherlands, France, UK, Canada, Turkey and Romania. India ranks 4th in area and 3rd in production in the world. The total potato production in India is about 36.57 million tonnes from about 1.83 million ha with productivity of 19.98 t ha during 2009-2010. Potato is grown over the states under very diverse conditions. The plant leaves must remain turgid for leaf expansion, to keep stomata open for higher photosynthetic rate. In plant, leaves functions as an optical organs and spectral radiation properties are attuned to environment in which they live. The efficiency of absorption of PAR partly determines the efficiency of photosynthesis of plant. The PAR is absorbed more efficiently and centering around 400-700 nm, determines the plant development. Among the main factors which affect the rapid establishment of the crop canopy are genotypes, planting date, planting density, temperature and the availability of water and nutrients in the soil. Potato is a weather sensitive crop influenced by environmental conditions. With this back ground in view, the present investigation was undertaken to know the relationship between stomatal conductance with haulm yield as affected by irrigation levels in potato.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Biological SciencesSame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207