Performance Of The Simplified Pesi Score In Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Rivaroxaban Or Standard Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) has been validated in the setting of standard treatment of pulmonary embolism with initial low molecular weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists. We evaluated the proposed simplified PESI in a large, phase III randomized trial involving patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without deep vein thrombosis, who were treated with rivaroxaban or standard therapy. Methods The EINSTEIN PE study was an open-label, randomized, phase III study that compared oral rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous enoxaparin overlapping with and followed by a vitamin K antagonist (warfarin or acenocoumarol, target international normalized ratio 2.0–3.0) for 3, 6, or 12 months in patients with acute, symptomatic pulmonary embolism. At baseline, the simplified PESI score was assessed, with 1 point each assigned for age >80 years, history of cancer, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, heart beat ≥110 beats per minute, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, and arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation <90%. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, fatal pulmonary embolism, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding at 7 days, 14 days, 30 days, 90 days, and at the end of the full intended treatment period were related to the simplified PESI score. Results It was possible to calculate the simplified PESI score in 4831 of the 4832 included patients, of whom 2589 (53.6%) had a PESI score of 0; 1775 (36.7%) had a score of 1; and 467 (9.7%) had a score of 2 or 3. No patient had a simplified PESI score greater than 3. Incidences of outcomes in relation to time period, simplified PESI score and treatment are presented in the following table. Conclusions Among patients with a simplified PESI score of 0 or 1, major clinical outcome events were rare during the first 30 days of treatment and were similar in patients treated with rivaroxaban or standard therapy. Patients with a simplified PESI score of 2 or more in both treatment groups had more frequent adverse outcomes both initially and in the long term. Disclosures: Fermann: Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Radiometer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cubist: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cardiorentis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Prins:Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy; Sanofi-aventis: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Thrombogenics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Wells:BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer Schering Pharma: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Biomerieux: Honoraria. Pap:Bayer Pharma AG: Employment. Lensing:Bayer Pharma AG: Employment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".