Las cooperativas ante los peligors de "desnaturalización" y "desmutualización"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El autor, coordinador de euskera en las cooperativas pertenecientes a MCC, hace un repaso de la evolucion desde los anos 70 -con el primer plan estrategico del euskera en el Grupo Fagor- hasta la situacion actual del euskera en estas cooperativas. Empieza reconociendo el compromiso, adquirido por el grupo ya en su octavo principio cooperativo, a favor de la recuperacion de la lengua y cultura vasca. Este compromiso se extiende tambien a la lengua y cultura de cada comunidad en la que ubican sus instalaciones productivas. Y ello se traduce en el reconocimiento en los propios estatutos de cada cooperativa del euskera como idioma para el ambito del trabajo,actualmente mayoritariamente desarrollado en castellano. Este objetivo exige conciencia, competencia y coherencia linguistica, para lo cual desde hace 7 anos y progresivamente estan siendo puestos en marcha microplanes sistematicos para la normalizacion del euskera, dentro de una metodologia yaexperimentada en Quebec, a traves de circulos de comunicacion. Y en este ambito la generalizacion del uso del correo electronico en euskera dentro de la empresa nos ofrece una perspectiva optimista.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".