Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pesar de que la Organizacion para la Seguridad y la Cooperacion en Europa (OSCE) es un organismo de menor categoria que la Union Europea o la OTAN, esta organizacion de caracter regional, que es la mayor del mundo en su genero, cuenta con un impresionante corpus de compromisos para con la democracia y los derechos humanos. Se encarga, ademas, de desarrollar actividades relacionadas con la democracia en muchos de los paises que engrosan sus filas y sigue siendo uno de los actores principales en la supervision de los procesos electorales. Pero la OSCE empieza a tambalearse. Desde Vladivostock hasta Vancouver, sus miembros no logran ponerse de acuerdo sobre el funcionamiento y el futuro de la organizacion. En los cuatro ultimos Consejos Ministeriales celebrados no se ha alcanzado ningun compromiso. Este trabajo pretende diseccionar los problemas y el proceso de reforma interna de la OSCE, y valorar como la organizacion podria ser util para fomentar los valores democraticos. Se aborda, asimismo, el progreso conseguido bajo la actual presidencia espanola de la OSCE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".