Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Nicola Phillips and Catherine E. Weaver Section 1: Perspectives on the 'American School' of IPE 1. The American School of IPE Daniel Maliniak and Michael J Tierney 2. The Old IPE and the New Robert O. Keohane 3. TRIPS across the Atlantic:Theory and Epistemology in IPE David A Lake 4. Ontology, Methodology, and Causation in the American School of IPE Henry Farrell & Martha Finnemore 5. Of Intellectual Monocultures and the Study of IPE Kathleen R McNamara 6. The Slow Death of Pluralism Nicola Phillips 7. The 'American School' of IPE? A Dissenting View Randall Germain 8. Beware What you Wish for: Lessons for IPE from the Transformation of Economics Robert Wade 9. Mid-Atlantic:Sitting on the Knife's Edge Peter J. Katzenstein Section 2: Perspectives on the 'British School' of IPE 10. THe 'British School' in the Global Context Robert Cox 11. Torn Between Two Lover? Caught in the Middle of British and American IPE Mark Blyth 12. IPE's Split Brain Catherine E Weaver 13. Political Economy, the 'US School', and the Manifest Destiny of Everyone Geoffrey R.D. Underhill 14. Do the Left-Out Matter? Craig N. Murphy 15. Pluralist IPE: A View from Outside the 'Schools' Helge Hveem 16. Division and Dialogue in Anglo-American IPE: A Reluctant Canadian View Eric Helleiner 17. The Proof of the Pudding is in the Eating:IPE in the Light of the Current Crisis of 2007/8 Ronen Palan Section 3: The Future of IPE 18. Mantras, Bridges and Benchmarks: Assessing The Future of IPE Jason Sharman 19. The Second Crisis in IPE Theory Jonathan Kirshner 20. The Gift of Skepticism and the Hopeful Future of IPE Louis Pauly 21. The Richness and Diversity of Critical IPE Perspectives: Moving Beyond the Debate on the 'British School' Ian Bruff, Magnus Ryner and Bastiaan van Appeldoorn 22. The Global Financial Crisis: Lessons and Opportunities for International Political Economy Layna Mosley and David Singer 23. Towards A New Consensus: From Denial to Acceptance Benjamin J. Cohen
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.163 | 0.038 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".