MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W978292076 · doi:10.20361/g2x01d

Good-bye, Fish by J. Koppens

2015· article· en· W978292076 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Catherine Wojcichowsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Deakin Review of Children s Literature · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingFish <Actinopterygii>SadnessStyle (visual arts)PublishingPsychologyVisual artsArtLiteratureBiologySocial psychologyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Koppens, Judith . Good-bye, Fish. Trans. Clavis Publishing Inc. Illus. Eline Van Lindenhuizen. New York: Clavis Publishing Inc., 2013. PrintGood-bye, Fish is another book from the Animal Square series. The series was originally published in Dutch and follows six animals: kitty, mouse, monkey, giraffe, rabbit, and dog. The front cover displays the six animals with a caption describing their personalities. These animal characters take care of each other, mimicking family or friends. This shows children that everyone helps each other, even if there are differences. This specific book, however, only focuses on three of the six Animal Square animals.The content of Good-bye, Fish is a wonderful resource for teaching young children about the death of a pet. When Kitty sees her fish not swimming, she worries. Dog tries to help Kitty with ideas to get the fish swimming again. Giraffe, in a matter of fact style, states that the fish has died. This book does a brilliant job tackling feelings of loss; by stating it is “hard to lose someone you love”. Dog and Giraffe help Kitty bury the fish in the garden explaining that the grave can be a special place to remember fish everyday. This book helps children identify their feelings of sadness when dealing with death, as the story ends with hope.Good-bye Fish is for preschool aged children; the pages are sturdy making it a perfect book for kids to read and re-read. The illustrations are done with softness and are colourful. You can see Kitty’s sadness through her tears. This is an excellent book for anyone who is dealing with grief.Highly recommended: 4 out of 4 starsReviewer: Catherine WojcichowskyCatherine Wojcichowsky is a teacher with Edmonton Catholic Schools and is currently completing her master’s degree in Elementary Education. She loves children’s literature, which she has the pleasure of enjoying it with her three year old son, Benjamin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2160.181

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Deakin Review of Children s LiteratureSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207