Physical properties characteristic of Polish and Canadian lentil seeds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A b s t r a c t. The physical properties of the Polish variety of lentil seed, Tina and the Canadian variety, Laird Lentil (the most popular variety imported into Poland) were compared. The parameters of individual seeds (size distribution, mass per 1000 seeds) and the parameters of bulk seed (the bulk density, the porosity, the angle of internal friction, the wall friction coefficient and the pressure ratio) of both varieties were compared for the moisture content of the seed within the range 9 to 21%. The seeds of the Canadian variety were found to be shapelier than the seeds of the Polish variety. The different swelling characteristics observed between the two varieties can be attributed to the different anatomical structures of the seed coating /husk/ in the two varieties. The seed coating of the Polish variety is rougher than that of the Canadian variety. Microscope photos of cross-sections of the seeds indicated that the seed coat of the Canadian variety is approximately twice as thin as the Polish variety. The concentration of papillary cells on the surface of the seed coat is higher in the case of the Canadian variety which produces a smoother surface than does the Polish variety. The mechanical properties of bulk seed were similar for both varieties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it