MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inhibitory effect of ammonia on urea flux across rumen epithelium depends on level of serosal urea

2013· book-chapter· en· W983640258 on OpenAlexaff
M. E. Walpole, G.B. Penner, T. Mutsvangwa

Bibliographic record

VenueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhloretinRumenUreaAmmoniaEpitheliumFlux (metallurgy)ChemistryBiochemistryAnimal scienceBiologyFermentationOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ruminants perpetually depend on their ability to transfer urea from blood to the rumen in order to maintain a positive N balance. Estimates indicate that 40 to 80% of endogenously-produced urea can be recycled to the rumen where it provides ruminally-available N for microbial growth (Lapierre and Lobley, 2001), so it is important to understand the regulatory mechanisms that control trans-epithelial urea transfer into the rumen. Increasing ruminal ammonia (NH3-N) concentration decreases trans-epithelial urea transfer from blood into the rumen (Abdoun et al., 2009); however, the mechanisms that are responsible for this response are uncertain. Facilitative urea transporter proteins (UT-B) are expressed in ruminal epithelium and the addition of phloretin, an inhibitor of UT-B function, reduces trans-epithelial flux of urea in isolated ruminal epithelium (Stewart et al., 2005), thus providing proof that these UT-B might have a functional role in ruminal urea transfer. However, the functional role of UT-B in mediating the effects of ruminal NH3-N on trans-epithelial flux of urea remains obscure. We evaluated the effects of mucosal NH3 and serosal urea concentrations on total and UT-B-dependent (i.e. phloretin-sensitive) urea flux across the isolated bovine ruminal epithelium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207