MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W985278532

Jupiter Increases Risk of Comet Strike on Earth

2007· article· zh· W985278532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
陈芳

Bibliographic record

Venue科技英语学习 · 2007
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrobiologyCometJupiter (rocket family)Earth (classical element)GeologyAstronomyPhysicsSpacecraft
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

一直以来,许多天文学家推测,木星的引力能使地球生命不受彗星袭击影响。但是,近日英国米林基那斯市函授大学的物理学家乔纳森.霍纳尔(Jonathan Horner)和巴里.琼斯(Barrie Jones)共同通过计算机模拟试验证实,如果木星根本就不存在,某些彗星也不可能入侵地球,并揭示了来自木星与海王星之间的小行星对地球的威胁。霍纳尔指出,木星既是威胁的来源,同时也是遮蔽风险的保护者。总之,根据霍纳尔和琼斯的研究结果,地球不是那么容易受到木星族彗星的影响。但是如果木星变成土星那样大小,那么彗星撞击地球的几率将大为增加。霍纳尔还表示,这项工作的长期目标是为了使我们在更宽广的意义上理解关于星球生命的问题。然而,我们的太阳系是我们探索外星世界的起点。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue科技英语学习Same topicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeFrench-language works237,207