MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W990123370 · doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-hort:1987

PHASE-OUT METHYL BROMIDE IN ROMANIA HORTICULTURE – CONSTITUTIVE AT PRESERVATIVE ACTIONS OF THE OZON LAYER

2007· article· en· W990123370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Bogoescu, Mădălina Doltu, L.M. Iliescu, Niculina Tanasa

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFumigationBromideSoil solarizationGreenhouseEnvironmental scienceAgronomySteamingCrop rotationHorticultureBiologyCropChemistryFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soilborne pathogens are very destructive in greenhouse-grown vegetable crops and one of the most limiting factors to farmer’s income. Their management worldwide has been based on pre-plant soil fumigation with methyl bromide, a compound whose phase-out procedure was initiated in the Montreal Protocol (1992) due to its hazardous effects on the environment. All the current methyl bromide substitutes and control measures for controlling soilborne pathogens in greenhouse-grown vegetable crops have limitations, compared with methyl bromide. The alternatives to methyl bromide should be based on an integrated crop management approach, implementing and alternating powerful control measures such as soil disinfestation with soil fumigation, solarization and steaming, and the use of plant resistance. Other control measures such as the use of commercial formulations of biological control agents, the incorporation into the soil with organic soil amendments and cultural practices such as rotation, bare fallow and farm hygiene are less effective than soil disinfestation but they usually suppress the development of soilborne diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca HorticultureSame topicPlant Disease Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207