SU‐E‐T‐100: An Approach to Improving the Dynamic Delivery Accuracy for Breast IMRT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: A method is established to improve the accuracy of the IMRT dose delivery for the treatment of breast and chest wall tumors when the higher dose gradient is delivered at the end of the leaf sequence. Methods: Dynamic MLC deliveries on Varian Linacs are achieved through the motion of the leaves from X1 to X2 direction. If the higher dose gradient is at the end of the leaf motion sequence, this can Result in an increased error in the overall dose delivery. Such errors have been observed in Lateral beams for Left‐sided and Medial beams for Right‐sided treatments. To evaluate and resolve this issue we adopted an approach where the fluence for such beams was geometrically flipped (mirrored) to treat the higher end of the dose gradient first. Results: Using this method, it was possible to deliver the optimized dose map to the area of interest still using only the X1–X2 direction of the leaf motion. The accuracy of this method was tested on different beam as part of our pre‐treatment QA program on both Varian delivery systems. With this approach we found that there was significant improvement in delivery accuracy on both 21EX and TrueBeam systems. Beams of initial Gamma index (3% and 3mm) 89–93% were increased to 98–99%. We also observed superior delivery accuracy with TB compared to the 21EX Conclusion: This work demonstrate the need for a delivery sequence option from X2–X1 in situations where the MLC sequence indicates higher dose gradient component is being delivered at the end of the sequence. Results from this work can be considered in the IMRT beam optimization in the treatment planning systems. Further work will be required to establish the application of this approach in clinical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".