afffund
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2015· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
2,208
citations
Works
Every work in the frame. Each row carries the routes that admitted it, because a frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited.
Route
Field
Type
Language
Year range
to
Screen consensus
Sort
Flags
1 filter active
10,000+ workspage 4
aff
Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2003· article· en· Spine· Decision Sciences
2,199
citations
aff
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2010· article· en· Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics· Decision Sciences
2,180
citations
aff
GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature2006· article· en· International Journal of Geographical Information Systems· Decision Sciences
2,163
citations
aff
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery2021· article· en· International Journal of Surgery· Decision Sciences
2,140
citations
affno abstract
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed2010· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
2,097
citations
aff
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas2021· article· es· Revista Española de Cardiología· Decision Sciences
1,950
citations
aff
A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity2005· article· en· Econometrica· Decision Sciences
1,948
citations
afffund
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2010· article· en· Trials· Decision Sciences
1,931
citations
aff
The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments2016· article· en· Scientific Data· Decision Sciences
1,910
citations
aff
Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems2010· article· en· Operations Research· Decision Sciences
1,895
citations
venueno aff
A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases2013· article· en· Asian Social Science· Decision Sciences
1,875
citations
aff
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote2016· article· en· Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA· Decision Sciences
1,874
citations
afffund
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2010· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
1,865
citations
aff
A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors2002· article· en· Journal of Behavioral Decision Making· Decision Sciences
1,865
citations
affno abstract
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias2011· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
1,843
citations
aff
The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose2015· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences
1,833
citations
affabout
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement2008· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences
1,829
citations
aff
A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis2014· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences
1,820
citations
affno abstract
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews2009· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
1,770
citations
aff
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews2022· article· en· JBI Evidence Synthesis· Decision Sciences
1,717
citations
aff
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies2008· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences
1,680
citations
aff
2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group2009· article· en· Spine· Decision Sciences
1,662
citations
affno abstract
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis2014· article· en· The Lancet· Decision Sciences
1,644
citations
afffund
Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis2015· article· en· Research Synthesis Methods· Decision Sciences
1,615
citations