MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

407 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
407 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 9

Labels cover 407 of 407 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 407 of 407 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutgemma · bibliometricsgpt · bibliometrics+scholarly_communicationmodels split
A retrospective overview of <i>Journal of Enterprising Communities</i>: <i>People and Places in the Global Economy</i> from2007 to 2021 using abibliometric analysis
Meghna Chhabra, Léo‐Paul Dana, Veland Ramadani, Monika Agarwal
2021· article· en· Journal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
16
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Nigerian Academics Patronizing Predatory Journals
Adeyinka Tella
2020· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integrityconsensus · none
13
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · scholarly_communicationmodels split
Research evidence communication for policy-makers: a rapid scoping review on frameworks, guidance and tools, and barriers and facilitators
Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Roberta Crevelário de Melo, Letícia Aparecida Lopes Bezerra da Silva, Bruna Carolina de Araújo, Cintia de Freitas Oliveira, Tereza Setsuko Toma +3 more
2024· article· en· Health Research Policy and Systems· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · metaresearch
13
citations
afffundaboutgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers
Esther Mc Sween-Cadieux, Julie Lane, Quan Nha Hong, Andrée‐Anne Houle, François Lauzier‐Jobin, Eliane Saint-Pierre Mousset +5 more
2024· article· en· Health Research Policy and Systems· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
13
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_sciencegpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels agree
Evaluating and Promoting Open Data Practices in Open Access Journals
Eleni Castro, Mercè Crosas, Alex Garnett, Kasey Sheridan, Micah Altman
2017· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · metaresearch
13
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels split
Chinese PhD Students’ Perceptions of Predatory Journals: A Survey Study
Jiayun Wang, Jie Xu, Dianyun Chen
2021· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
13
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Research on Predatory Publishing in Health Care: A Scoping Review
Marilyn H. Oermann, Julee Waldrop, Leslie H. Nicoll, Gabriel M. Peterson, Kerry Simmons Drabish, Heather Carter‐Templeton +4 more
2023· review· en· Canadian Journal of Nursing Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
12
citations
affvenuegemma · metaresearch+bibliometricsgpt · bibliometrics+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Hype or Real Threat: The Extent of Predatory Journals in Student Bibliographies
Rainer Schira, Chris Hurst
2019· article· en· Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integrityconsensus · none
12
citations
afffundgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels split
Constructing a true<scp>LCSH</scp>tree of a science and engineering collection
Charles‐Antoine Julien, Pierre Tirilly, John E. Leide, Catherine Guastavino
2012· article· en· Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
11
citations
aboutno affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Analysis of potential predatory journals in radiology
Serkan Arıbal, Okan İnce, Eyüp Kaya, Hakan Önder
2020· article· en· Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels agree
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher
Daeria O. Lawson, Michael Ke Wang, Kevin Kim, Rachel Eikelboom, Myanca Rodrigues, Daniela Trapsa +2 more
2022· letter· en· Trials· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
11
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Publication Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in Emergency Medicine
Maria B. Ospina, Karen D. Kelly, Terry P. Klassen, Brian H. Rowe
2006· article· en· Academic Emergency Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
11
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communication+research_integritygpt · scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Plagiarism, Publishing, and the Academy
Dan Harms
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+research_integrityconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundgemma · open_sciencegpt · scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Science research
Alice Fleerackers, Natascha Chtena, Stephen Pinfield, Juan Pablo Alperín, Germana Barata, Monique Batista de Oliveira +1 more
2023· review· en· F1000Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study
Danielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone, Edoardo Aromataris, Miloslav Klugar, Anna Mae Scott +6 more
2023· article· en· Research Synthesis Methods· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
10
citations
affvenuegemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Predatory Journals : Do Not Enter
Faizan Khan, David Moher
2017· article· en· University of Ottawa Journal of Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundvenueaboutgemma · bibliometrics+open_sciencegpt · bibliometrics+open_science+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Measuring the prevalence of open access in Canada: A national comparison
Virginie Paquet, Simon van Bellen, Vincent Larivière
2022· article· en· Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+open_scienceconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communication+open_sciencegpt · scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
Open Publication, Digital Abundance, and Scarce Labour
Martin Paul Eve
2017· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · no categorymodels split
Writing a Series of Best-Selling Research Reference Books
Yan Piaw Chua
2009· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
8
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About