MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,640 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,640 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 33

Labels cover 0 of 1,640 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,640 of 1,640 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Image‐based 3D Modelling: A Review
Fabio Remondino, Sabry F. El-Hakim
2006· review· en· The Photogrammetric Record· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1,004
citations
affunlabeled
State Estimation for Robotics
Timothy D. Barfoot
2017· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
735
citations
affunlabeled
The bubble cursor
Tovi Grossman, Ravin Balakrishnan
2005· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
589
citations
afffundunlabeled
Revisiting active perception
Růžena Bajcsy, Yiannis Aloimonos, John K. Tsotsos
2017· article· en· Autonomous Robots· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
310
citations
affunlabeled
Designing Highly Reliable Fiducial Markers
Mark A. Fiala
2009· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
226
citations
affunlabeled
GlobFit
Yangyan Li, Xiaokun Wu, Yiorgos Chrysathou, Andrei Sharf, Daniel Cohen‐Or, Niloy J. Mitra
2011· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
166
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Multi-robot collaboration for robust exploration
Ioannis Rekleitis, Gregory Dudek, Evangelos Milios
2001· article· en· Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
162
citations
affunlabeled
State Estimation for Robotics
Timothy D. Barfoot
2024· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
141
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Modeling Coverage in Camera Networks: A Survey
Aaron Mavrinac, Xiang Chen
2012· article· en· International Journal of Computer Vision· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
138
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About