MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

133 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20172025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
133 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 133 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 133 of 133 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
A new proof rule for almost-sure termination
Annabelle McIver, Carroll Morgan, Benjamin Lucien Kaminski, Joost-Pieter Katoen
2017· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
98
citations
affunlabeled
How do programmers use unsafe rust?
Vytautas Astrauskas, Christoph Matheja, Federico Poli, Péter Müller, Alexander J. Summers
2020· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
75
citations
afffundunlabeled
Understanding the use of lambda expressions in Java
Davood Mazinanian, Ameya Ketkar, Nikolaos Tsantalis, Danny Dig
2017· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
72
citations
affunlabeled
The future is ours: prophecy variables in separation logic
Ralf Jung, Rodolphe Lepigre, G. Parthasarathy, Marianna Rapoport, Amin Timany, Derek Dreyer +1 more
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
afffundunlabeled
A model for reasoning about JavaScript promises
Magnus Madsen, Ondřej Lhoták, Frank Tip
2017· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · open_scienceconsensus · none
36
citations
afffundunlabeled
Strategy synthesis for linear arithmetic games
Azadeh Farzan, Zachary Kincaid
2017· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
36
citations
fundno affunlabeled
A probabilistic separation logic
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affunlabeled
Flux: Liquid Types for Rust
Nico Lehmann, Adam T. Geller, Niki Vazou, Ranjit Jhala
2023· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Modular specification and verification of closures in Rust
Fabian Wolff, Aurel Bílý, Christoph Matheja, Péter Müller, Alexander J. Summers
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reductions for safety proofs
Azadeh Farzan, Anthony Vandikas
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Proto-Quipper with Dynamic Lifting
Peng Fu, Kohei Kishida, Neil J. Ross, Peter Selinger
2023· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
Mixed linear and non-linear recursive types
Bert Lindenhovius, Michael Mislove, Vladimir Zamdzhiev
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Proving hypersafety compositionally
Emanuele D’Osualdo, Azadeh Farzan, Derek Dreyer
2022· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
MacoCaml: Staging Composable and Compilable Macros
Ningning Xie, Leo White, Olivier Nicole, Jeremy Yallop
2023· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Semantic Code Refactoring for Abstract Data Types
Shankara Pailoor, Yuepeng Wang, Işıl Dillig
2024· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Handling bidirectional control flow
Yizhou Zhang, Guido Salvaneschi, Andrew C. Myers
2020· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
On the Expressive Power of String Constraints
Joel D. Day, Vijay Ganesh, Nathan Grewal, Florín Manea
2023· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
From high-level inference algorithms to efficient code
Rajan Walia, P. J. Narayanan, Jacques Carette, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt, Chung-chieh Shan
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
flap: A Deterministic Parser with Fused Lexing
Jeremy Yallop, Ningning Xie, Neel Krishnaswami
2023· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Coarser Equivalences for Causal Concurrency
Azadeh Farzan, Umang Mathur
2024· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
A type-and-effect system for object initialization
Fengyun Liu, Ondřej Lhoták, Aggelos Biboudis, Paolo G. Giarrusso, Martin Odersky
2020· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About