MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,728 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,728 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 55

Labels cover 3 of 2,728 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,728 of 2,728 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Measures of phonological typicality
Padraic Monaghan, Morten H. Christiansen, Thomas A. Farmer, Stanka A. Fitneva
2010· article· en· The Mental Lexicon· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
Towards a Restricted Realization Theory
Jason D. Haugen, Daniel Siddiqi
2016· book-chapter· en· Linguistik aktuell· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
A comparison of four vowel overlap measures
Matthew C. Kelley, Benjamin V. Tucker
2020· article· en· The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
afffundunlabeled
Nuosu Yi
Jerold A. Edmondson, John H. Esling, LAMA Ziwo
2016· article· en· Journal of the International Phonetic Association· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
Speech aging: Production and perception
Benjamin V. Tucker, C. Lawrence Ford, Stephanie Hedges
2021· review· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Canadian Raising, Opacity, and Rephonemicization
William J. Idsardi
2006· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Root‐Affix Asymmetries
Suzanne Urbanczyk
2011· other· en· The Blackwell Companion to Phonology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Investigating the emphatic feature in Iraqi Arabic
Zeki Majeed Hassan, John H. Esling
2011· book-chapter· en· Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Music to Your Ears
Tamara Rathcke, Simone Falk, Simone Dalla Bella
2021· article· en· Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About