MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

504 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
504 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 11

Labels cover 25 of 504 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 504 of 504 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
The Ottawa SAH search algorithms: protocol for a multi- centre validation study of primary subarachnoid hemorrhage prediction models using health administrative data (the SAHepi prediction study protocol)
Shane English, Lauralyn McIntyre, Victoria Saigle, Michaël Chassé, Dean Fergusson, Alexis F. Turgeon +6 more
2018· article· en· BMC Medical Research Methodology· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+sts+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Qualitative dyadic analysis in care partnership research: a scoping review
Andrea Parks, Lesley Gotlib Conn, Bahar Aria, A Li, Agessandro Abrahão, Lorne Zinman +1 more
2025· review· en· BMC Medical Research Methodology· Health Professions
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+bibliometrics+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+research_integrity
2
citations
affunlabeled
Correction to: Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol
Bradley C. Johnston, Pablo Alonso‐Coello, Małgorzata M Bała, Dena Zeraatkar, Montserrat Rabassa, Claudia Valli +5 more
2019· erratum· en· BMC Medical Research Methodology· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · no categorymodels split
A study of implementation factors for a novel approach to clinical trials: constructs for consideration in the coordination of direct-to-patient online-based medical research
Peter F. Cronholm, Janelle Applequist, Jeffrey P. Krischer, Ebony Fontenot, Trocon Davis, Cristina Burroughs +14 more
2024· article· en· BMC Medical Research Methodology· Health Professions
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About