MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

779 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
779 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 11 of 16

Labels cover 3 of 779 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 779 of 779 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
La détection du mensonge
Michel St‐Yves, Joe Navarro
2014· article· fr· Psychiatrie et violence· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
From association to gist: Some critical tests.
Charles J. Brainerd, Min Chang, D. M. Bialer, X. Liu
2023· article· en· Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Beliefs about deception in Australia
Rebecca Wilcoxson, Vincent Denault, Matthew Browne, Nathan Brooks, Paul Duckett
2025· article· en· The International Journal of Evidence & Proof· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Positive Side of Imposture in Twelfth Night
Devyn Manderscheid, Alex Diakow, Shania Wallin
2018· article· en· USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Lying and Truth
Stephen Wright
2018· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Raciocínio deôntico em reclusos
Ana Cristina Quelhas, João Guerreiro
2012· article· pt· Análise Psicológica· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The Truth Project
David M. Markowitz, Kate Blackburn, Keya Saxena, J. Levy Marion, Omar Olivarez, Rebecca Hernandez +2 more
2021· article· en· Journal of Language and Social Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
A double standard in evaluating implicit threats
Madison Hynes, Tianshuang Han, Brent Snook, L. Fleming Fallon
2024· article· en· Psychology Crime and Law· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About