MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,523 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,523 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 31

Labels cover 2 of 1,523 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,523 of 1,523 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
LONG-RUN TRENDS IN HUMAN BODY MASS
Nils‐Petter Lagerlöf
2007· article· en· Macroeconomic Dynamics· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
An evolutionary perspective on orgasm.
Gordon G. Gallup, John P. Towne, Jennifer A. Stolz
2017· article· en· Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
The Mathematics of Facial Beauty
Arthur Swift, B. Kent Remington
2019· other· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Isokinetic relationships
Wolfgang Linert, A. Yelon
2012· article· de· Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundunlabeled
Sex differences in music perception are negligible
Mila Bertolo, Daniel Müllensiefen, Isabelle Peretz, Sarah C. Woolley, Jon T. Sakata, Samuel A. Mehr
2023· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Inclusive fitness in human relationships
J. Philippe Rushton
2008· article· en· Biological Journal of the Linnean Society· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Inter-sexual mate competition in three cultures
Scott W. Semenyna, Francisco R. Gómez Jiménez, Doug P. VanderLaan, Paul L. Vasey
2020· article· en· PLoS ONE· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits
Tanya M. Pennell, Judith E. Mank, Suzanne H. Alonzo, David J. Hosken
2024· review· en· Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Chinese infant facial cues
Anthony A. Volk
2009· article· en· Journal of Evolutionary Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About