MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

656 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
656 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 14

Labels cover 0 of 656 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 656 of 656 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Symplectic representation of the Ginzburg–Landau theory
E. A. Reis, G. X. A. Petronilo, Rodrigo G. Amorim, H. Belich, F. C. Khanna, A. E. Santana
2024· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Report on 2210.03468v1
Ondřej Kubů, Libor Šnobl
2022· peer-review· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
British Columbia Federationist
2017· article· en· Open Collections· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Observing a changing Hilbert-space inner product
Salini Karuvade, Abhijeet Alase, Barry C. Sanders
2022· preprint· en· Physical Review Research· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Page 177
2011· article· en· Pittsburg State University Digital Commons (Pittsburg State University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Toledo, Ohio
2009· other· en· OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Schrödinger System
Michael Martin Nieto, D. Rodney Truax
2001· article· en· Annals of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Summer 2005: Montage
2005· other· en· Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About