MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

709 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
709 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 15

Labels cover 0 of 709 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 709 of 709 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Biomedical Applications of Proteomics
David R. Goodlett
2005· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Chemistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Arsenic on the Hands of Children: Wang et al. Respond
Zhongwen Wang, Elena Kwon, Hongquan Zhang, Gian S. Jhangri, Xiufen Lu, Xing‐Fang Li +3 more
2005· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Use of Meta-analyses by IARC Working Groups
Kurt Straíf, Leslie Stayner, Paul A. Demers, Philip J. Landrigan
2012· letter· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Policy: Cloud Banks: Airlines Save Halon
Adrian Burton
2006· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
A BETR way to track toxic pollutants.
Richard Dahl
2002· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Dioxin-Contaminated Farmed Salmon: Foran et al. Respond
Jeffery A. Foran, David O. Carpenter, M. Coreen Hamilton, Barbara A. Knuth, Steven J. Schwager
2005· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
A Less Trashy Nova Scotia
LA Greene
2001· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Air Pollution and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Response
Shiliang Liu, Daniel Krewski, Yuanli Shi, Yue Chen, Richard T. Burnett
2004· article· en· Environmental Health Perspectives· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About