MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

7,589 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
7,589 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 131 of 152

Labels cover 6 of 7,589 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 7,589 of 7,589 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Limits on the H I content of the dwarf galaxy Hydra II
Andrew Janzen, Eve Klopf, Felix J. Lockman, Rodolfo Montez, Kurt Plarre, Nau Raj Pokhrel +3 more
2015· article· en· Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Extragalactic globular cluster near-infrared spectroscopy
L G Dahmer-Hahn, Ana L. Chies-Santos, E. Eftekhari, E. Zanatta, Rogério Riffel, A. Vazdekis +3 more
2024· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
DRAO deep polarization study at 1.4 GHz
J. K. Grant, A. R. Taylor, J. M. Stil, R. Ricci, S. P. O’Sullivan, T. L. Landecker +2 more
2008· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Redshift measurement through star formation
Mikkel Lindholmer, Kevin A. Pimbblet
2019· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
An Hα Dynamical Mass for HE 0047–1756
K. J. Inskip, K. Jahnkę, Hans‐Walter Rix, C. Y. Peng
2009· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Cosmic Evolution of Quasars
Carole Jackson, J. V. Wall, P. A. Shaver, Ken Kellermann, I. Hook
2005· article· en· Highlights of Astronomy· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Globular Clusters in NGC 5128: The IMACS survey
M. Gómez, D. Geisler, William E. Harris, G. L. H. Harris, Kristin A. Woodley
2006· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Stellar Populations and Kinematics in Spiral Galaxies
Lauren A. MacArthur, J. González‐Hernández, Stéphane Courteau, M. McDonald
2009· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Feedback on Galaxy Formation
B. R. McNamara
2013· letter· en· Science· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Evolving Shape of Galaxy Clusters
Dennis W. Just, H. K. C. Yee, Adam Muzzin, Gillian Wilson, David Gilbank, Michael D. Gladders
2014· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The star formation history of the Magellanic Clouds
Carme Gallart, Ingrid Meschin, Noelia E. D. Noël, A. Aparicio, S. L. Hidalgo, P. B. Stetson
2008· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Modeling the Structure of the Windy Torus in Quasars
S. C. Gallagher, M. M. Abado, J. E. Everett
2013· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The lens SW05 J143454.4+522850: a fossil group at redshift 0.6?
Philipp Denzel, Onur Çatmabacak, Jonathan Coles, Claude Cornen, Robert Feldmann, Ignacio Ferreras +5 more
2021· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Size-Luminosity Relation of Disk Galaxies in EDisCS Clusters
Stephanie M. Gogarten, Julianne J. Dalcanton, Luc Simard, Gregory Rudnick, Vandana Desai
2006· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The ROSAT Raster survey in the north ecliptic pole field
G. Hasinger, M. J. Freyberg, E. M. Hu, C. Waters, P. Capak, A. Moneti +1 more
2020· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Euclid</i> preparation
William L. Matthewson, Ruth Durrer, S. Camera, I. Tutusaus, B. Altieri, A. Amara +207 more
2025· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Probing Stellar Mass Assembly in the Virgo Cluster
Joel Roediger, Stéphane Courteau, M. McDonald, Lauren A. MacArthur
2009· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
On the H <scp>i</scp> Content of MaNGA Major Merger Pairs
Qingzheng Yu, Taotao Fang, Shuai Feng, Bo Zhang, C. K. Xu, Yunting Wang +1 more
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
FeLoBAL Outflow Variability Constraints from Multi-Year Observations
S. M. McGraw, Joseph C. Shields, Frederick Hamann, Daniel M. Capellupo, S. C. Gallagher, W. N. Brandt
2013· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Feedback and Outflows
Norman Murray
2012· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Stellar Populations in Spiral Galaxies
2006· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Received; accepted
2005· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About