MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,177 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,177 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 24

Labels cover 1 of 1,177 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,177 of 1,177 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A Measure of Decision Flexibility
Ross D. Shachter, Marvin Mandelbaum
2013· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Inhibiting beliefs demands attention
Kevin R. Barton, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Daniel Smilek
2009· article· en· Thinking & Reasoning· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Investment Home Bias with Peer Effect
Haim Levy
2020· article· en· Journal of risk and financial management· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Analogy in Decision Making
Massimiliano Amarante
2015· article· en· Mathematics of Operations Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Psychology Behind Bad Decisions
Hassan Qudrat‐Ullah
2025· book-chapter· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About