MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 15 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Search for three body pion decays <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math>
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, M. Aoki, M. Blecher, D. Britton, Dorothea Vom Bruch, D. Bryman +18 more
2021· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Gravitational wave echo of relaxion trapping
Abhishek Banerjee, Eric Madge, Gilad Pérez, Wolfram Ratzinger, Pedro Schwaller
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Universal construction of black hole microstates
Ana Climent, Roberto Emparan, Javier M. Magán, Martin Sasieta, Alejandro Vilar López
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Hunting for dark matter and new physics with GECCO
Adam Coogan, A. A. Moiseev, Logan Morrison, Stefano Profumo, Matthew G. Baring, A. E. Bolotnikov +6 more
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundunlabeled
Lensing of vacuum entanglement near Schwarzschild black holes
João G. A. Caribé, Robert H. Jonsson, Marc Casals, Achim Kempf, Eduardo Martín-Martínez
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundunlabeled
Instabilities in Horndeski-Yang-Mills inflation
Jose Beltrán Jiménez, Lavinia Heisenberg, Ryotaro Kase, Ryo Namba, Shinji Tsujikawa
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundunlabeled
Triggering on emerging jets
Dylan Linthorne, Daniel Stolarski
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Spin-2 fields and the weak gravity conjecture
Claudia de Rham, Lavinia Heisenberg, Andrew J. Tolley
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quasinormal modes of scalar fields on small Reissner-Nordström-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>AdS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> black holes
Julián Barragán Amado, Bruno Carneiro da Cunha, Elisabetta Pallante
2022· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
fundno affunlabeled
From complexity geometry to holographic spacetime
Johanna Erdmenger, Anna-Lena Weigel, Marius Gerbershagen, Michał P. Heller
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Quantum reference frames from top-down crossed products
Shadi Ali Ahmad, Wissam Chemissany, Marc S. Klinger, Robert G. Leigh
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About