MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,166 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,166 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 44

Labels cover 8 of 2,166 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,166 of 2,166 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Survival and complications of zygomatic implants compared to conventional implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow‐up period of at least 5 years: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Vittório Moraschini, Tiago Rocha de Queiroz, Suelen Cristina Sartoretto, Daniel Almeida, Mônica Diuana Calasans‐Maia, Rafael Seabra Louro
2022· review· en· Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research· Dentistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Zirconia Dental Implants Modified by Femtosecond Laser versus Titanium Implants: An Experimental Study in Fox Hound Dogs
José Luís Calvo‐Guirado, Antonio Aguilar‐Salvatierra, Rafael Delgado-Ruíz, Bruno Negrí, Maria Piedad Ramírez Fernández, José Eduardo Maté Sánchez de Val +2 more
2013· article· en· Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research· Dentistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Anatomical Bases for the Insertion of Zygomatic Implants
Marcelle Alvarez Rossi, Luís Rogério Duarte, Robson Gonçalves de Mendonça, Atson Carlos de Souza Fernandes
2008· article· en· Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research· Dentistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A Comparison of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments for Microleakage
Mohamed I. Abdelhamed, Jeffrey D. Galley, Michael T. Bailey, William M. Johnston, Julie A. Holloway, Edwin A. McGlumphy +1 more
2015· article· en· Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research· Dentistry
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About