MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

852 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
852 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 18

Labels cover 2 of 852 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 852 of 852 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Purgatory
Thomas St. James O’Connor
2020· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Research as Daily Practice
Sally St. George, Dan Wulff
2019· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Metaphysics as Therapy
Karl-Stéphan Bouthillette
2025· book· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
ADVANCES IN THE METHODOLOGY OF PRESENCING
Olen Gunnlaugson
2025· article· en· International journal of presencing leadership & coaching.· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Grief-Writing
Jodi Latremouille
2022· article· en· Art/Research International A Transdisciplinary Journal· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Provoking Dialogues: Worth Striking For
Isabel Nuñez, Ligia López López, Arlo Kempf, Jennifer Job, Mayme Francyne Huckaby, Pamela J. Konkol
2017· article· en· Journal of Curriculum Theorizing· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Book Reviews
Jorden A. Cummings
2010· article· en· British Journal of Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Entretien avec Virginia Satir
D Lecomte, Yves Lecomte
2006· article· fr· Santé mentale au Québec· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Friend or foe?
Simmee Chung, Jinny Menon
2023· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About