MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,021 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,021 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 21

Labels cover 3 of 1,021 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,021 of 1,021 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The Five Pillars of Learning
Omar M. Salim
2023· book-chapter· en· Springer international handbooks of education· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
A Lutheran Learning Paradigm
Paul J. Dovre
2011· article· en· Intersections Canadian Journal of Music· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ticking “no religion”
Simeon Wallis
2014· article· Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religion (JBASR)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Stereotyped Knowledge
2025· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Agents of Hope
2009· article· en· Digital Commons - George Fox University (George Fox University)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Picturing Religious Diversity
Catherine Holtmann, Nancy Nason‐Clark
2016· article· en· Bulletin for the Study of Religion· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
L'opzione pastorale per l'evangelizzazione
M. Midali
2000· article· en· Orientamenti pedagogici: rivista internazionale di scienze dell'educazione· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About