MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,294 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,294 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 26

Labels cover 1 of 1,294 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,294 of 1,294 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
Spouting of biomass particles: A review
Heping Cui, John R. Grace
2007· review· en· Bioresource Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
79
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Hydrodynamic study of a toroidal fluidized bed reactor
Jun Shu, V. I. Lakshmanan, C.E Dodson
2000· article· en· Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
Voidage and particle velocity profiles in a spout‐fluid bed
Denis Lorenzo Pianarosa, Luís Alexandre Pedro de Freitas, C. Jim Lim, John R. Grace, Ö. M. Doğan
2000· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
afffundunlabeled
CPFD flow pattern simulation in downer reactors
Alireza Abbasi, Mohammad Ashraful Islam, Paul E. Ege, Hugo de Lasa
2012· article· en· AIChE Journal· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Progress in developments of dry coal beneficiation
Yuemin Zhao, Xuliang Yang, Zhenfu Luo, Chenlong Duan, Shulei Song
2014· article· en· International Journal of Coal Science & Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
57
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About