MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,131 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,131 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 23

Labels cover 1 of 1,131 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,131 of 1,131 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
A Dynamo-based Forecast of Solar Cycle 25
François Labonville, Paul Charbonneau, Alexandre Lemerle
2019· article· en· Solar Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmic-ray-driven dynamo in galactic disks
M. Hanasz, K. Otmianowska‐Mazur, G. Kowal, H. Lesch
2009· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
80
citations
affunlabeled
Turbulence Heating ObserveR – satellite mission proposal
A. Vaivads, Alessandro Retinò, J. Souček, Y. V. Khotyaintsev, F. Valentini, C. P. Escoubet +41 more
2016· article· en· Journal of Plasma Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
70
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Recent Advances on Solar Global Magnetism and Variability
A. S. Brun, Matthew K. Browning, Mausumi Dikpati, Hideyuki Hotta, Antoine Strugarek
2013· article· en· Space Science Reviews· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
70
citations
affunlabeled
Are Cluster Magnetic Fields Primordial?
Robi Banerjee, Karsten Jedamzik
2003· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
68
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Solar and Stellar Dynamos
Paul Charbonneau
2012· book· en· Saas-Fee Advanced Course· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
65
citations
affunlabeled
MOST Observations of the Flare Star AD Leo1
2012· article· en· Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Torsional Oscillations in a Global Solar Dynamo
Patrice Beaudoin, Paul Charbonneau, Étienne Racine, Piotr K. Smolarkiewicz
2012· article· en· Solar Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About