MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,935 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,935 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 39

Labels cover 22 of 1,935 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,935 of 1,935 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Nonparametric Econometrics: A Primer
Jeffrey Scott Racine
2008· book· en· Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
106
citations
fundno affunlabeled
dclone: Data Cloning in R
Péter Sólymos
2010· article· en· The R Journal· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
affunlabeled
Covariate-adjusted nonlinear regression
Xia Cui, Wensheng Guo, Lu Lin, Lixing Zhu
2009· article· en· The Annals of Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Quantile regression
Kiranmoy Das, Martin Krzywinski, Naomi Altman
2019· article· en· Nature Methods· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
102
citations
affunlabeled
CONSISTENT MODEL SPECIFICATION TESTS
Yanqin Fan, Qi Li
2000· article· en· Econometric Theory· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
89
citations
affvenueunlabeled
The estimating function bootstrap
Feifang Hu, John D. Kalbfleisch
2000· article· en· Canadian Journal of Statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
88
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Fitting semiparametric cure models
Yingwei Peng
2003· article· en· Computational Statistics & Data Analysis· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
86
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Interval-wise testing for functional data
Alessia Pini, Simone Vantini
2017· article· en· Journal of nonparametric statistics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
72
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About