MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,499 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,499 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 20 of 30

Labels cover 2 of 1,499 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,499 of 1,499 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
From parent to progeny
Sara Shama, Michelle R. Asbury, Deborah L. O’Connor
2024· article· en· Cell Host & Microbe· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Caregiving and Employment in the Canadian Context
Janet Fast
2014· article· en· XVIII ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 13-19, 2014)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Care Home Stories
Sally Chivers, Ulla Kriebernegg
2021· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
China's Grandmothers
Diana Lary
2022· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Patterns of Elder Caregiving Among Nigerians: An Integrative Review
Chibuzo Stephanie Okigbo, Shannon Freeman, Dawn Hemingway, Jacqueline Holler, Glen Schmidt
2025· article· en· International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Raging Prayers for the Aged
David J. Roy
2008· editorial· en· Journal of Palliative Care· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Family Home Caregivers for Elderly people
Azza Abdelmoneium, Michael Corman, Janet Rankin
2019· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Demography and Digital Transformation in Japan
Brian Stewart
2023· book-chapter· en· Economics, law, and institutions in Asia Pacific· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
PROSPERED Dataset: Parental leave
Arijit Nandi, Efe Atabay, Ilona Vincent
2019· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Quality of Life of Caregivers
Alex C. Michalos
2014· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Respite for rural and remote caregivers
Neena L. Chappell, Bonnie Schroeder, Michelle Gibbens
2008· other· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About