MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Vision
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,808 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,808 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 21 of 57

Labels cover 2 of 2,808 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,808 of 2,808 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
[no title]
Craig S. Chapman, Melvyn A. Goodale
2010· article· en· Journal of Vision· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
What is Perceptual Curvature?
Hao Wu, James H. Elder
2016· article· en· Journal of Vision· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Comparing V1 between myopes and emmetropes.
Konogan Baranton, Trung Hieu Nguyen, Maki Yoshida, Guillaume Giraudet
2014· article· en· Journal of Vision· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Spatial frequency streams in natural scene categorization
Alan Chauvin, Daniel Fiset, Christian Éthier, K. Tadros, Martin Arguin, Frédéric Gosselin
2010· article· en· Journal of Vision· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On the neural mechanism of fear recognition
Sylvain Roy, Nathalie Gosselin, F. Gosselin, I. Peretz
2010· article· en· Journal of Vision· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
A new fat face illusion: Psychophysical evidence
Yuan Hsun Sun, Liezhong Ge, Paul C. Quinn, Z. Wang, Na Xiao, Huimin Shi +3 more
2012· article· en· Journal of Vision· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About