MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,131 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,131 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 22 of 23

Labels cover 1 of 1,131 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,131 of 1,131 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Can turbulent reconnection be fast in 2D?
K. Kulpa-Dybeł, G. Kowal, K. Otmianowska‐Mazur, A. Lazarian, Ethan T. Vishniac
2010· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Radio emission models of colliding-wind binary systems
S. M. Dougherty, J. M. Pittard, Laura Kasian, R. F. Coker, P. M. Williams, Huw Lloyd
2003· article· en· Symposium - International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Exploring the deep convection and magnetism of A-type stars
Nicholas A. Featherstone, Matthew K. Browning, A. S. Brun, Juri Toomre
2010· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
A First Course in Magnetohydrodynamics
David A. Clarke
2025· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
New Books
2003· article· en· Physics Today· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Weak magnetic fields in CP stars
M. Aurière, G. A. Wade, F. Lignières, J. D. Landstreet, J.‐F. Donati, I. Kh. Iliev +4 more
2008· preprint· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Astrogation and Milestones
Irina Isaakyan
2024· book-chapter· en· IMISCOE research series· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction to R Programming
2019· dataset· en· Borealis· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
X-Rays From Cepheids: Why?
2018· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About