MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 22 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Factors Affecting Researchers' Collaborative Patterns: A Case Study from Maghreb Universities / Les facteurs affectant les pratiques de collaboration des chercheurs : Une étude de cas des universités maghrébines
Hind Achachi, Z. Amor, Corinne-Colette Dahel-Mekhancha, M. Cherraj, Hamid Bouabid, Sandra Selmanovic +1 more
2016· article· fr· Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Update to Our Reader, Reviewer, and Author Communities—April 2020
Cynthia J. Burrows, Shu Wang, Hyun Jae Kim, Gerald J. Meyer, Kirk S. Schanze, T. Randall Lee +60 more
2020· editorial· en· Journal of the American Chemical Society· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
3
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
The burden of article processing charges on Canadian universities
Marc‐André Simard, Toluwase Asubiaro, Philippe Mongeon
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Open Access publishing: benefits and challenges
Anna Strömberg, Tone M Norekvål, Philip Moons, Sandra Lauck
2023· article· en· European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Japanese Science in a Global World
Kenichi Arai
2010· editorial· en· Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Will Peer Review Still Function and How?
Sheri Spaine Long
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affgemma · bibliometrics+metaresearchgpt · bibliometrics+metaresearchmodels agree
Orthopedic research productivity of KSA: First bibliometric analysis
Abdulaziz Z. Alomar, Nouf Altwaijri, Khalid I. Khoshhal
2024· article· en· Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Markets for Scientific Attribution
Joshua S. Gans, Fiona Murray
2022· article· en· The Journal of Law Economics and Organization· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Open Access Publishing: A Literature Review
Giancarlo Frosio, Estelle Derclaye
2014· review· en· Lirias (KU Leuven)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Task specialization across research careers
Nicolás Robinson‐García, Rodrigo Costas, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Vincent Larivière, Gabriela F. Nane
2020· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About