MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,999 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,999 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 40

Labels cover 2 of 1,999 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,999 of 1,999 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
NetFlow-Based Anomaly Traffic Analyzer
Xiaowei Ye
2007· article· en· Microcomputer applications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
AI for Network Security
Dilli Prasad Sharma, Arash Habibi Lashkari, Mahdi Daghmehchi Firoozjaei, Samaneh Mahdavifar, Pulei Xiong
2025· book-chapter· en· Progress in IS· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Comprehensive Advanced Persistent Threats Dataset
Abdussamad Syed, Boubakr Nour, Makan Pourzandi, Chadi Assi, Mourad Debbabi
2025· article· en· IEEE Networking Letters· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
AIWAS
Toan Huynh, James Miller
2012· article· en· International Journal of Systems and Service-Oriented Engineering· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Rational Information Leakage
Raffi Indjejikian, Hai Lu, Liyan Yang
2011· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Vulnerability analysis of IP traceback schemes
Lin Cai, Jianping Pan, Shen Su-bin
2005· article· en· GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005.· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
DRL Challenges in Wireless Networks
Dinh Thai Hoang, Nguyễn Văn Huynh, Diep N. Nguyen, Ekram Hossain, Dusit Niyato
2023· other· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Green Middleware
Hans‐Arno Jacobsen, Vinod Muthusamy
2011· book-chapter· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About