MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The Impact Factor: Just the Facts
Kenneth J. Zucker
2013· editorial· en· Archives of Sexual Behavior· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Grey Literature
A. Delyla Ulm, Elizabeth Shaffer
2023· book-chapter· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
The Case For and Against Double-blind Reviews
Amelia R. Cox, Robert Montgomerie
2018· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Review Boards for Scientific Publishing
Nathan Hagen
2018· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Altmetrics: present and future
Judit Bar‐Ilan, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Willian Gunn, Stefanie Haustein, Stacy Konkiel, Vincent Larivière +1 more
2013· article· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affgemma · metaresearch+open_sciencegpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
New Media for Science: Key Features of Platforms with Open Peer Review
Angelina Gorbunova, Ivan Zassoursky, N. D. Trishchenko
2021· article· en· Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundvenueno abstractunlabeled
Evaluation of Open-Access Journals in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Eva Suarthana, Nadin Alghanaim, Neyla Boukhili, Togas Tulandi
2021· article· en· Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+open_scienceconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Knowledge Transfer Services
Albert Simard
2008· article· en· Revue de géographie alpine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometrics+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Cruising: Impact Factor Data
Kenneth J. Zucker, James M. Cantor
2009· editorial· en· Archives of Sexual Behavior· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Information Science: The Canadian Context
Dietmar Wolfram, Clara M. Chu
2009· article· en· Scientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometrics+stsconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About