MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,344 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,344 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 25 of 27

Labels cover 0 of 1,344 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,344 of 1,344 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Legal‐Rational Authority
Joseph Agassi
2017· other· en· The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Contesting Norms
2025· book-chapter· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Dissent and Legitimacy
Geoffrey D. Callaghan
2022· article· en· Moral Philosophy and Politics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Virtue Trait by Situation Interactions
2024· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Book reviews
George W. Wright, Desmond M. Clarke, G. H. R. Parkinson, Gary Banham, Don A. Habibi, T. L. S. Sprigge +2 more
2002· article· en· British Journal for the History of Philosophy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Rights in Search of Protection†
Jacob Weinrib
2020· article· en· Oxford Journal of Legal Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Ethics of Betrayal
jan jagodzinski, Jason Wallin
2013· book-chapter· en· SensePublishers eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
by
2015· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Diversity and the Liberal State
Xavier Landes, Nils Holtug
2011· article· fr· Les ateliers de l éthique· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Dignity, Choice, and Circumstances
Denise G. Réaume
2013· book-chapter· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Thinking Alternatives
2024· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Peace and Philosophical Disarmament
Samuel D. Rocha
2023· article· en· Studies in Philosophy and Education· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Conclusion
2023· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
On the Best Life
Chris Berger
2011· article· en· The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Guilt: a contemporary introduction
David Sugar
2025· article· en· Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Was J. C. Smuts an idealist philosopher?
William Sweet
2025· article· en· South African Journal of Philosophy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Liberalism, Through a Glass Darkly
David F. Hardwick, Leslie Marsh
2020· book-chapter· en· Palgrave studies in classical liberalism· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reification
Rob Beamish
2017· other· en· The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
5. What Are Politics?
Matt Hern, Am Johal
2024· book-chapter· en· Neue Ökologie· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About