MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,922 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,922 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 39

Labels cover 6 of 1,922 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,922 of 1,922 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Property-Driven Statistics of Biological Networks
Pierre-Yves Bourguignon, Vincent Danos, François Képès, Serge Smidtas, Vincent Schächter
2006· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Chemical biology on PINs and NeeDLes
François‐Xavier Campbell‐Valois, Stephen W. Michnick
2005· review· en· Current Opinion in Chemical Biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Population kinetics of progression free survival (PFS).
David J. Stewart, Dominick Bossé, Andrew Robinson, Michael Ong, Stephanie Yasmin Brule, Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung +3 more
2019· article· en· Journal of Clinical Oncology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
An approximate search engine for structural databases
Jason T. L. Wang, Xiong Wang, Dennis Shasha, Bruce A. Shapiro, Kaizhong Zhang, Qicheng Ma +1 more
2000· article· en· ACM SIGMOD Record· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Abstract 1155: cBioPortal for cancer genomics
Jianjiong Gao, Tali Mazor, Ino de Bruijn, Adam Abeshouse, Diana Baiceanu, Ziya Erkoç +34 more
2022· article· en· Cancer Research· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Network Biology editorial 2013
Edward M. Marcotte, Charles Boone, M. Madan Babu, Anne‐Claude Gavin
2013· editorial· en· Molecular BioSystems· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Application of omic technologies in cancer research
Sarah Wagner, Graham Ball, A. Graham Pockley, Amanda K. Miles
2018· article· en· Translational Medicine Reports· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About