MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,476 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,476 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 27 of 30

Labels cover 20 of 1,476 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,476 of 1,476 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
10 university presses endorse OA
Peter Suber
2009· preprint· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_science+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
fundvenueno affunlabeled
Reflections on the 2024 ESJP review process: Sam
Samantha Hoang
2025· article· en· International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Correction
Tim Cole, Sanja Stanojevic, J. Stocks, Allan L. Coates, J. Hankinson, A. M. Wade
2009· article· en· Statistics in Medicine· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Orofacial Cleft
John H. Duffus, Michael Schwenk, Douglas M. Templeton
2017· dataset· en· IUPAC Standards Online· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Thank You to Our 2021 Reviewers
Lisa M. Beal, D. P. Chambers, Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs, C. Gnanaseelan, Nathalie F. Goodkin, Robert D. Hetland +11 more
2022· article· en· Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Six‐Month CTS Update Report
Dennis Bowie
2004· article· en· Canadian Respiratory Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Annual Meeting Update
Kevin Woller
2019· article· en· The Leading Edge· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About